DECISION ANSWER · HIGH RISK
Should I repair or replace a 15-year-old furnace?
Age matters, but safety, repair history, efficiency, comfort, and the cost of the current failure matter more.
A 15-year-old furnace is not automatically due for replacement. Repair can make sense for a safe, isolated, reasonably priced failure; replacement becomes more compelling when there is a heat-exchanger or combustion concern, repeated breakdowns, poor comfort, or a major repair that approaches the value of a newer system.
Repair may make sense when
The failure is isolated, the equipment has been maintained, parts remain available, and a qualified technician confirms safe operation after repair.
Replacement may make sense when
Safety defects, repeated repairs, unavailable parts, chronic comfort problems, or a large repair change the economics. A written diagnosis and comparable scopes are more useful than age alone.
Questions to ask
Ask what failed, how the failure was confirmed, whether a safety test was performed, what warranty applies, and which costs are excluded from the quote.
Compare safety, failure severity, repair history, comfort, parts, and expected ownership period.
What to do next
Common questions
Does furnace age alone justify replacement?
No. Age is one input. Condition, safety findings, repair cost, parts, performance, and household plans should be considered together.
Should I keep running a furnace with a combustion warning?
Do not ignore combustion or carbon-monoxide concerns. Follow detector instructions, leave the affected area when indicated, and obtain qualified emergency evaluation.
Sources and review notes
This decision support is educational and does not replace an on-site professional inspection, emergency service, permit determination, or insurance decision.
- Furnaces and BoilersU.S. Department of Energy
- Carbon Monoxide Poisoning BasicsCenters for Disease Control and Prevention